Science and Technology for Pollinating Insects: Engaging urban citizens through museums

Science and Technology for Pollinating Insects: Engaging urban citizens through museums

Contact
Mateusz Tokarski
Main Organisation
Department/Sector/Unit
JRC.S2
Other Organisations
Directorate-General for Environment

Description

Over the last decades, the decline in the abundance and diversity of European wild insect pollinators has drawn much scientific and public attention. The trend constitutes a dramatic issue for both biodiversity protection and food security due to the crucial role of pollination in the propagation of many plant species. To provide a framework for a coherent tackling of pollinators decline across the European Union, in 2018 the European Commission adopted the EU Pollinators Initiative, which has been revised in 2023 (COM(2023) 35) as A New Deal for Pollinators. This Communication set up an EU-wide framework for short- to long-term actions to understand better the drivers and dynamics of the decline and ultimately support the recovery of insects. The third priority of the Initiative focuses on ‘Mobilising the society and promoting strategic planning and cooperation at all levels’, highlighting that ‘Implementing the actions outlined under the previous two priorities will require broad mobilisation of all relevant actors, including scientists, policymakers, citizens, farmers and businesses’.

The Science and Technology for Pollinating Insects (STING) project is developed under the framework of the European Initiative on Pollinators, with one of its work packages focusing on exploring innovative forms of engaging citizens using the principles of co-creation. As part of this project, several pilots have been implemented testing different methodologies with focus on different social groups and in different locations. This included pilots focusing on youth engagement as well as collaborations between citizens and farmers

This specific project focused on engaging urban citizens in developing local interventions for supporting coexistence between people and pollinators. In particular the pilots explored the potential role of museums as locations for citizen engagement processes. In methodological terms, the project included testing arts-based methods as well as the recently developed virtual reality experience Pollinator Park.   

Museums were chosen as locations for these pilots because of the recent trend of promoting participatory approaches, where these institutions take on the role of supporting the dialogue between different types of knowledge, including the local and experiential knowledge of citizens and the established scientific knowledge. Thanks to this museums are progressively become 'safe spaces' where difficult discussions on timely and controversial topics can take place. Due to the emphasis on sensory, aesthetic and emotional experience, museums also become fitting locations for testing new methodologies grounded in arts, prototyping or material deliberation.

Participation Spectrum

When and Where

Start Year
2023
End Year
2023

Policy Context

Participants

Participants
116
How were the Participants selected?

Methodologies

Events
6
Tools Used

Impact

Main Outcomes and Lasting Achievement
The activities designed and tested will be used in the development of a Toolkit on engaging citizens around the decline of pollinating insects, which is being developed by the Competence Centre on Participatory and Deliberative Democracy.
Other Feedback
Evaluation survey, media dissemination of results, interviews with collaborators

Assessment

Lessons Learn
Museums are excellent partners in carrying out participatory activities in terms of providing a context that supports conversation and creative activities. The exhibitions can trigger conversations and open new perspectives on the issues discussed. Finally, they are institutions with wide networks and are often well inserted into local communities, thus they can provide support in recruitment, communication, contact with experts as well as raise the legitimacy of the participatory processes.

Digital tools, like the virtual reality experience tested, need to be well framed and used carefully, having in mind that for participatory processes taking place in-person many of the activities run with their support can be also organised without them, sometimes with a better effect and less resources.

Based on the different artistic activities that were tested it can be concluded that different media lend themselves better to different aims. While drawings were a great support in developing ideas for actions, performances tended to focus more on analysis and presentation of the problem and its causes.
Recommendation
When institutions plan to launch participatory processes in collaboration with museums, adequate time needs to be reserved to be built a relationships over time, developing trust and the mutual understanding of capacities and modes of working.

The use of art-based practices needs to be assessed carefully with respect to the desired results obtained, with some activities better fitting for presentation of the problem while others for the development of solutions. Adequate professional support should be offered to citizens when artistic practices are being used, e.g. by having theatre instructors or artists.

Support of thematic experts (e.g. entomologists, botanists, ecologists) is important to provide more technical input into the discussions. However, much attention needs to be paid to the appropriate briefing of scientific experts in terms of type of collaboration and input expected.